Jun
13
Didn’t take long for Safari to take the headlines again. Yesterday, Safari generated a fair amount of press by releasing a Windows beta version. For better or for worse, this brought about the close scrutiny of many people. Naysayers were quick to respond, telling that even Mac users don’t use Safari.
To make matters worse, security experts tested and subsequently released information of its vulnerabilities - for both OSX and Windows beta. Porting to Windows represent a double edged sword, you’ll get a slice of the market share while security exploiters will pay more attention as well. Were it not for the decision to port Safari to Windows, we believe that Safari would’ve remain relatively more secure (in the ’security by obscurity’ sense).
Sources:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=283
http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9728500-7.html
http://larholm.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-0day-exploit-in-2-hours/
http://erratasec.blogspot.com/2007/06/niiiice.html
Tags: Apple, Beta, Browser, Hacking, News, OS X, Safari, Security, Software, Windows
Hi there! To have stuff like this delivered to you daily, just subscribe to our full feeds. It's easy to share this now with the world .
It is no surprise to me that transporting something from OS X to Windows would add more vulnerabilities in the security. This being said, I love the fact this has come out. I thought it was a stupid idea to put it on Windows in the first place. It is only good for dual-boot users to have. If a person is stuck on Safari and they have dual-boot then they shouldn’t even be allowed to have or use dual-boot, in my opinion.
Agreed, but IMO despite the bad press, it’s great sign of things to come. Hopefully some useful Mac apps (TextMate especially) will start porting to Windows
young inocent hentai another hentai inocent
Where can i buy ambien for next day delivery….
Generic ambien. How to stop taking ambien. Ambien online. Ambien forum….